February 5, 2001
VALLEY CENTER MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
Regular Board Meeting
Monday, February 5, 2001
Time: 2:00 P.M.
Place: Board Room
29300 Valley Center Rd.
Valley Center, CA 92082
The Valley Center Municipal Water District Board of Directors’ meeting was called to order by
President Broomell at 2:00 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Board members present were: Directors Broomell, Armstrong, Polito, Aleshire and Stone. Staff
members present were: General Manager Arant, Assistant General Counsel Strand, District
Engineer Jewell, Director of Finance Jarrell, Director of Operations Dacus, Manager of Accounting
Jeffrey, Manager of Human Resources Hale, and Board Secretary Stetson. Spectators present
were: Mr. Ross, Valley Roadrunner Newspaper, and Yadira Galindo, North County Times
Newspaper.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1.
Upon motion by Armstrong, seconded by Stone and unanimously carried, the following consent calendar items were approved:
• Minutes of the Board meeting held January 15, 2001
• Notice of Completion which was filed for the Valley Center Municipal Water
District’s 8-inch Pipeline Extension Project
• Audit demand check numbers 83167 through 83415
• Treasurer’s Report for the period ended December 31, 2000
PUBLIC HEARING
2. Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Increase in the STEP (Rimrock) Pressure Sewer
Maintenance Fee:
The public hearing to consider a proposed increase in the STEP pressure sewer maintenance
monthly fee was opened at 2:01 p.m. The affected customers (approximately 33) were
notified of the proposed increase in the monthly maintenance fee for their STEP pressure
sewer systems and of the public hearing to be conducted to consider this matter. The
proposed increase, to be effective March 15, 2001, is from $21.00 per month to $27.00 per
month.
Valley Center Municipal Water District
Board of Directors’ Meeting
2 2/5/2001
A summary of the estimated average costs to maintain the STEP pressure sewer
maintenance system was reviewed as set forth below:
Monthly Maintenance $ 8.00
Major Life Cycle Costs:
Pump Rebuild (7 yr. cycle) 4.17
Pump Replaced (7 yr. cycle) 14.29
Sludge Pump Out (5 yr. cycle) 3.33
Sludge Processing Credit (3.00)
Net: $26.79 or $27.00 rounded
No written communications were received regarding the proposed increase in the STEP
pressure sewer maintenance monthly fee and no comments were received from members of
the audience. The public hearing was closed at 2:06 p.m.
Upon motion by Armstrong, seconded by Polito and unanimously carried, the following
ordinance, increasing the STEP Pressure Sewer Maintenance Fee to $27.00 per month
per EDU to be effective March 15, 2001, entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 2001-04
ORDINANCE OF THE VALLEY CENTER MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT TO AMEND SECTION 172.2(a)(3) OF THE
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TO PROVIDE FOR AN INCREASE
IN THE STEP PRESSURE SEWER MAINTENANCE FEE
was adopted by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Directors Broomell, Armstrong, Polito, Aleshire and Stone
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ACTION AGENDA
3. Request to Amend the Budget to Appropriate Funds to Comply with the OSHA Ergonomic
Regulations:
A goal specified in the District’s current Strategic Plan is to conduct an ergonomic review of
work stations and work environment. Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) legislation, Ergonomics Program Standard, became effective January 16, 2001,
which mandates implementation of workplace engineering and administrative controls to
reduce the number of work-related musculoskeletal disorders and injuries occurring in the
workplace.
Valley Center Municipal Water District
Board of Directors’ Meeting
3 2/5/2001
ACWA/JPIA Risk Management personnel completed a workplace safety assessment for the
District in which several “at risk” areas of concern were identified. It was recommended that
the District consult with an ergonomic specialist to determine the ergonomically correct
solutions.
Bob Tripp of ARC Ergonomics was retained to perform an assessment of the District’s
workstations to ensure compliance with the Ergonomic Program Standards. Resulting from
the assessment was a recommendation to provide employees with flexible workstations.
Manager of Human Resources Hale explained that, as tasks and employees change, the
recommended workstations are not static or fixed offering an employee flexibility to adjust the
workstation components (i.e. computer keyboard tray, chair, and desk level) for the comfort
and appropriate levels and angles for each employee’s particular needs. The assessment
also resulted in seven workstations identified as “high risk” in which modification or
replacement of the workstations with ergonomically designed equipment was recommended
to minimize the risk of injury and to increase productivity by reducing fatigue. Slides
demonstrating the various ergonomically designed components were viewed; including, the
adjustable keyboard tray, chair, and desk which can be raised with a touch of a finger
permitting the employee to stand and work.
Mr. Bob Tripp of ARC Ergonomics addressed the Board stating that upper body stress injuries
have substantially increased in the workforce as a direct result of maintaining static loads and
utilizing furniture designed prior to use of computers. The more sedentary work in front of the
computer in recent years has increased reports of upper body stress injuries. The State of
Washington conducted a 4-year study in an effort to reduce workers’ compensation costs.
The study attributed the use of an ergonomic (flexible) work chair for the 60% decrease in
injuries and the 90% decrease in workers’ compensation premium costs that were realized.
Mr. Tripp further explained that $1 in every $3 spent today in the United States for workers’
compensation is due to upper body stress or musculoskeletal injuries. It has been shown that
modifying work stations to ergonomically appropriate equipment will lower injury rates and
workers’ compensation costs, reduce absenteeism and fatigue, as well as reduce employee
turn-over and subsequent training costs.
The seven workstations identified in the assessment as “high risk” have been modified or
replaced with ergonomically designed equipment as recommended. The cost for these
improvements ($25,025) was funded by using equipment and furniture funds in the FY 2000-
01 budget. The average cost per workstation was $3,575. To fully implement the ergonomic
recommendations to comply with the Federal OSHA Ergonomic Program Standard in Fiscal
Year 2000-01, an additional $90,069 needs to be appropriated in the current budget.
Adherence to the safety practice of utilizing the flexibility offered by the ergonomic equipment
will be encouraged and monitored to reduce the problems associated with upper body stress
injuries as well as the practice of intermittent exercises to prevent the onset of these injuries
as recommended by physical therapists.
Valley Center Municipal Water District
Board of Directors’ Meeting
4 2/5/2001
Upon motion by Stone, seconded by Armstrong and unanimously carried, the following
resolution, entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-01
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
VALLEY CENTER MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT TO
AMEND THE BUDGET TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS
TO COMPLY WITH OSHA ERGONOMIC REGULATIONS
was adopted by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Directors Broomell, Armstrong, Polito, Aleshire and Stone
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
4. Request for a Budget Adjustment for Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Pilot
Program:
A pilot program for SCADA had been approved by the Board in October 2000 that included
installing a SCADA computer at the Operations Center and transmitting SCADA information
from the Lower Moosa Canyon Wastewater Plant and Lilac Pump Station to the District’s
Operations Center. The SCADA pilot program will provide proof of concept for the selected
equipment for a future District-wide SCADA project and assurance that we are proceeding
in the appropriate direction without incurring excessive costs. The pilot program provides
for installation of equipment that would have been included in the District-wide SCADA
project.
Staff was directed to utilize radio communications for the Lilac Pump Station. Adding radio
communication to the SCADA pilot program will require installation of radios at the Oak Glen
Reservoir, McNally Reservoir and the Operations Center. Radio communication in the pilot
program; including, evaluation of radio systems, design and project management, purchase
and installation of radios at the three sites, and incorporation of facility signals at the three
sites requires that an additional $30,000 be funded. An estimated total cost for the SCADA
pilot project is $130,000.
Completion of the SCADA pilot program will result in the following:
~ A SCADA computer in the Operations Center
~ Office network and direct dial-in access to the SCADA system
~ Moosa SCADA information connected to the SCADA network via the existing T1 phone
line
~ Lilac Pump Station, Oak Glen Reservoir and McNally Reservoir connected to the
SCADA network via radio communication
~ A radio survey of all the remaining District sites indicating the acceptability of the
Valley Center Municipal Water District
Board of Directors’ Meeting
5 2/5/2001
proposed spread spectrum system
~ A Request for Proposal for a design/build District-wide SCADA implementation project.
Upon motion by Aleshire, seconded by Armstrong and unanimously carried, the
following resolution, entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-04
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
VALLEY CENTER MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
AMENDING THE 2000-01 BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING
AN ADDITIONAL $30,000 INTO
ACCOUNT #01-5685.78 (SCADA SYSTEM DESIGN)
was adopted by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Directors Broomell, Armstrong, Polito, Aleshire and Stone
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
5. Amendment No. 2 to the District’s “Standard Specifications for the Construction of Water
Mains and Facilities”:
Amendment No. 2 to the District’s
“Standard Specifications for the Construction of Water Mains and Facilities”
, which incorporates changes such as prohibition of the use of alcohol and drugs at a District project, clarification of soil compaction requirements, updating
protective coating products used on pipes and appurtenances, road certification
requirements, and updating changes in insurance requirements was presented for the Board’s
consideration. General Counsel has reviewed and approved changes contained in the
amendment. The District’s amended Specifications, if adopted, will be included on the
District’s web page for access by District personnel and contractors.
Upon motion by Aleshire, seconded by Polito and unanimously carried, the following
resolution, entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-03
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF VALLEY CENTER MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
ADOPTING AMENDMENT #2 TO THE “STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF WATER MAINS AND FACILITIES”
was adopted by the following vote, to wit:
Valley Center Municipal Water District
Board of Directors’ Meeting
6 2/5/2001
AYES: Directors Broomell, Armstrong, Polito, Aleshire and Stone
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
6. Request for Approval to Purchase Five New Vehicles:
As approved in the 2000-01 budget, bids were solicited for four ½ ton full size trucks and one
1½ ton full size truck. Twelve bids were received with the lowest being submitted by North
County Ford for all five vehicles. The total for the four ½ ton trucks is $92,540.95 and
$33,788.33 for the 1½ ton truck. Approval for the purchase of these five vehicles from North
County Ford was recommended.
Upon motion by Aleshire, seconded by Stone and unanimously carried, Purchase Order
#15190 ($92,540.95) and Purchase Order #15191 ($33,788.33) were approved for the
purchase of five new vehicles from North County Ford.
7. Update on Electricity Deregulation:
An accounting of the District’s Pumping Reserve fund for Fiscal Year 1999-00 and the first
half of Fiscal Year 2000-01 was reviewed which details the depletion of the reserve fund
resulting from the escalating electrical and natural gas prices in the wake of California’s
electrical deregulation. As of December 31, 2000, the Pumping Reserve has a negative
balance of $290,826.77. The District’s energy costs for water pumping averaged $0.2315
per kWh on its January bills, while its December bills had averaged $0.2051 per kWh. An
analysis of energy costs/pumping zone income for the Moosa Sewer Treatment Fund and
Skyline Sewer Treatment Fund was provided and is attached as Exhibit “A”.
It was estimated that the District’s pump zone rates would need to be increased 70% to fully
fund the District’s water pumping expenditures if current energy rates continue. State
legislation (AB 1-X) was approved to create a pool of money to buy energy. Director of
Finance Jarrell reported the price for energy purchased from this pool is unknown at this time
as bids are expected today with the purchase of power to be initiated tomorrow, February 6
th
. The District received a proposal from an energy provider with the following terms:
17¢ per kWh - 3 year contract
15¢ per kWh - 4 year contract
13.5¢ per kWh - 5 year contract
However, AB 1-X contains a provision that would prohibit the District’s execution of a longterm
contract with an energy provider. The legislation may be amended to allow the District
to enter into a long-term contract with an energy provider for the purchase of power.
Discussion ensued as to the need to produce additional electrical power within California,
including construction of nuclear power plants and dams for both water storage and
Valley Center Municipal Water District
Board of Directors’ Meeting
7 2/5/2001
generation of hydroelectric power. Staff will continue to evaluate the energy market and keep
the Board informed of any new developments.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ AGENDA
8. Report on the San Diego County Water Authority’s Board of Directors’ Meeting:
President Broomell reported that, at the San Diego County Water Authority Board of
Directors’ meeting of January 25
th
, authorization was granted: • to proceed with litigation against Metropolitan Water District pursuant to its Preferential
Rights. Approximately 8 representatives on the Authority Board from North County
voted against pursuing this litigation.
• for the General Manager to enter into an agreement relative to the determination of
preliminary feasibility of a private proposal option for the Regional Conveyance
System in Mexico. The Authority will participate as a technical adviser.
• to expend $50,000 for a study of the Carlsbad seawater desalination plant.
CLOSED SESSION
9. A Closed Session was called by President Broomell at 3:42 p.m. pursuant to:
• Government Code §54956.9(c), Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation.
Name of case: Sweetwater Authority vs. Dynegy
• Government Code §54957.6(a) – Conference with Labor Negotiators
Designated Representatives: Gary T. Arant, Jere L. Jarrell and Linda Hale
Employee Organization: Valley Center M.W.D. Employees’ Association
Bargaining Unit
The regular meeting was reconvened at 4:21 p.m. No action was reported.
ADJOURNMENT
10.
Upon motion by Aleshire, seconded by Stone and unanimously carried, the meeting was adjourned at 4:22 p.m.
ATTEST: ATTEST:
______________________________ _______________________________
Secretary President