February 4, 2002
VALLEY CENTER MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
Regular Board Meeting
Monday, February 4, 2002
Time: 2:00 P.M.
Place: Board Room
29300 Valley Center Rd.
Valley Center, CA 92082
The Valley Center Municipal Water District Board of Directors’ meeting was called to order by
President Broomell at 2:00 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Board members present: Directors Broomell, Polito, Aleshire, Stone, and Haskell. Staff members
present: General Manager Arant, General Counsel Cowett, District Engineer Jewell, Director of
Finance Jarrell, Director of Operations Dacus, Manager of Accounting Jeffrey, Project Engineer
Grabbe, Engineering Services Supervisor Gootee, Manager of Human Resources Hale and Board
Secretary Stetson. No spectators were present.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1.
Upon motion by Aleshire, seconded by Polito and unanimously carried, the following consent calendar items were approved:
<
Minutes of the Board meeting held January 7, 2002
<
Concept approval of the Choufa Water Line Extension project consisting of approximately 520 feet of 8-inch water main, two 6 inch fire hydrants, five water services and other
required appurtenances
<
Audit demand check numbers 87660 through 87993
<
Treasurer’s Report for the period ended December 31, 2001
ACTION AGENDA
2. Amendment No. 4 to the District’s Standard Specifications for the Construction of Water
Mains and Facilities:
Proposed revisions to the District’s “
Standard Specifications for the Construction of Water Mains and Facilities”
were presented to the Board for consideration of adoption as
Valley Center Municipal Water District
Board of Directors’ Meeting
2 2/4/02
summarized below:
• Air and Vacuum Valve (air/vacs) Installations - Modification will limit conditions allowing
underground installations and conform with the State Health Department Standards
providing underground air/vac installations only when an aboveground installation is not
“practicable”. Modifications to the District’s specifications will include a security cover
for aboveground air/vac installations.
• Erosion and Sediment Control - Changes proposed address erosion and sediment control
on projects to conform with current requirements. Projects that include extensive grading
are required to have an erosion and sediment control plan included with the project.
• Asphalt Concrete Paving - Proposed additional section to provide details for asphalt
paving which is being required on more of the projects.
• Blow Off Installations - Clarification of pipe lengths to standard drawings W-6 and W-7.
With the recent freezes, many aboveground meter services needed repair. Literature to
provide information on protection of aboveground services will be distributed to customers
in the future.
Upon motion by Polito, seconded by Haskell and unanimously carried, the following
resolution, entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-04
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF VALLEY CENTER MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT ADOPTING AMENDMENT #4 TO
THE “STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF WATER MAINS AND FACILITIES”
was adopted by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Directors Broomell, Polito, Aleshire, Stone and Haskell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
3. Moosa Special Projects - Amendment to the Budget and Award of Construction Contract:
Negotiations with AmeriCon for a change order to complete the Moosa Special Projects work
was not successful. Therefore, the $75,000 settlement due the District by AmeriCon cannot
be applied as a credit to the Moosa Special Projects budget as originally anticipated.
AmeriCon has indicated the settlement will be paid once their claim against the pipe supplier,
Valley Center Municipal Water District
Board of Directors’ Meeting
3 2/4/02
B&R Fabricators, is settled. As such, the $75,000 settlement from AmeriCon is now
considered a receivable. Project Engineer Grabbe noted that the District has retained
$47,000 from the original project at the Moosa Treatment Plant, and an agreement is in
process that will transfer these funds to the District. An amendment to the budget to allocate
an additional $75,000 for the Moosa Special Projects was recommended as the $75,000
receivable from AmeriCon had been included as a credit in the budget planning for these
projects.
Three bids were received for the Moosa Special Projects on January 30, 2002, in which the
lowest bid received was from Rich Construction at $215,426. A wide variance in the other
bids received ($290,785 and $445,317) can be attributed to prices from the electrical
contractors. The low bid from Rich Construction is approximately 10% over the engineering
estimate, but a lighting panel in the RAS pump station ($8,400) was added to the project and
had not been included in the original estimate. Staff recommended adoption of Resolution
No. 2002-05 to amend the budget for the Moosa Special Projects by appropriating an
additional $75,000 and award the contract to Rich Construction, Inc., the lowest responsible
bidder.
Upon motion by Aleshire, seconded by Polito and unanimously carried, the following
resolution, entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-05
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
VALLEY CENTER MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
AMENDING THE 2001-2002 BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING
AN ADDITIONAL $75,000 INTO ACCOUNT
#15-5605.78 AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR
THE MOOSA SPECIAL PROJECTS
was adopted by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Directors Broomell, Polito, Aleshire, Stone and Haskell
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
4. Via Cantamar Reservoir Site - Declare Property Surplus and Authorization to Sell the Surplus
Property:
Upon completion of the Via Cantamar Reservoir and recording of the Record of Survey Map
(No. 17200) for the parcel, it has been determined that 6.152 acres of the reservoir site is
excess property for the District’s needs, and that the District has no anticipated future need
for this excess property. Engineering Services Supervisor Gootee requested that the Board
declare the 6.152 acres as surplus and authorize staff to proceed with the sale of said surplus
Valley Center Municipal Water District
Board of Directors’ Meeting
4 2/4/02
property. Upon declaration that the property is excess, the following steps would be taken
to accomplish its sale:
<
Request quotes and acquire certified appraisal
<
Notify public agencies of available property
<
Notify adjoining property owners
<
If required, list property with broker Staff clarified that any offer for the purchase of the surplus 6.152 acres will be presented to
the Board for consideration of approval.
Upon motion by Aleshire, seconded by Polito and unanimously carried, parcel 1 of
Record of Survey Map No. 17200 (6.152 acres) was declared surplus and authorization
to proceed with its sale as set forth above was approved.
5. Estimates of the District’s Population:
Population data for the District’s service area from the federal census taken April 1, 2000,
indicates there were 7,432 occupied housing units with 20,773 residents with another
193 people in group quarters for a total population of 20,966. The average population per
dwelling was 2.82. In April of 1990, the population count was 5,911 housing units with a total
population of 17,541 and an average population of 2.97 per dwelling.
Director of Finance Jarrell reported that using the data from the recent federal census, the
District’s estimated population as of January 1, 2002, is 21,949 which is based on a dwelling
count of 7,939 with a per dwelling population of 2.80.
6. Valley Center-Pauma Unified School District Regional Occupational Program Advisory
Committee:
Linda Hale, Manager of Human Resources, reported that she is serving on the advisory
committee of the Valley Center-Pauma Unified School District Regional Occupational Center
and Programs (ROP). The ROP provides a school-to-career delivery system for high school
students and adults. The ROPs fill a critical need by offering career development and
workforce preparation to the approximately 80% of students who do not obtain BA/BS
degrees. Advisory committee members of the Valley Center-Pauma Unified School District
ROP will:
• advise on matters related to program activities, course content and competencies
needed,
• advise and/or authorize facilities and equipment,
• assist in long range planning,
• verify needs of local and regional job markets,
• ensure ROP curriculum meets current labor market demands, and
• serve as resources/liaisons in identifying other community/market resources.
Valley Center Municipal Water District
Board of Directors’ Meeting
5 2/4/02
Opportunities may soon become available for the District to utilize participants in the ROP in
internship positions.
7. Strategic Plan Specific Goals and Budget Objectives for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 - Mid-Year
Status Report:
The mid-year status report on the “2001-2002 and 2002-2003 Strategic Plan Specific Goals”
and the “Budget Objectives for Fiscal Year 2001-2002" was reviewed. Of the 57 identified
projects, 42 are complete or completion anticipated by the end of the fiscal year. Twelve of
the remaining projects are under the control of an outside agency or party and 3 are multiyear
projects.
Director Polito inquired as to the status of the proposed recreational use of Lake Turner by
the organized youth groups. General Manager Arant responded that alternative funding
sources are being sought for expenses associated with planning, environmental and
permitting work. Funds will be needed for development of a facility plan, environmental
document and Major Use Permit which are estimated to cost from $50,000 to $100,000. An
application has been processed for Community Block Development Grant (CDBG) funds,
however, funds would not be available from this source if the facilities are not open to the
general public. A response on this application is expected in the fall. Funding proposals
were submitted to Bell Enterprises and the San Diego Foundation. To date, no response has
been received.
The consortium group members (Boy/Girl Scouts of America, Boys and Girls Club United and
YMCA of San Diego County, Palomar Branch) have not been in contact with the District
inquiring as to the status of the recreational use proposal, but each are currently involved in
major projects. Director Aleshire reported that he recently had seen Gary Wegener of the
Palomar Family YMCA and had, upon Mr. Wegener’s inquiry, provided an update on the
proposed recreational project.
Director Aleshire commented that alternative funding sources for the permitting process work
may be successful. If not, the Board will need to make a decision on funding the Major Use
Permit. Further, the consortium members may need to approach their Board members
regarding the possibility of providing funds.
Director Polito voiced that staff time spent pursuing this project should not continue
indefinitely. He suggested that the consortium members contact their respective Boards to
ascertain if a commitment for funding could be secured. Director Aleshire noted that another
option is the development of Lake Turner as a County park as proposed by Supervisor Horn.
Staff was directed to include the consideration of Lake Turner for recreational use by
the consortium members on a board meeting agenda in approximately 3 to 4 months.
GENERAL MANAGER’S AGENDA
Valley Center Municipal Water District
Board of Directors’ Meeting
6 2/4/02
8. District Status Report, December 2001:
~ San Diego County Water Authority Regional Facilities Master Planning Process - Three
basic supply options are being examined which are: supply from the north
(Metropolitan’s system - $823.7 million), supply from the west (Metropolitan and
development of local desal. projects - $1.650 billion), and supply from the east (supply
from Metropolitan and construction of the Regional Colorado River Conveyance Facility -
$2.675 billion).
~ Metropolitan Water District’s Rate Structure - Metropolitan adopted its new rate structure
which includes the continuation of the Interim Agricultural Water Program. Also,
Metropolitan’s readiness-to-serve (RTS) charge will only be applicable on firm water
deliveries. As such, interruptible agricultural water deliveries will be exempt from the
RTS charge resulting in a reduction of the RTS charge collected from the District from
$1.8 million to approximately $300,000.
9. Shutdown of the 1
st
and 2
nd
Aqueducts: Customers were mailed notices in mid-January of the water use restrictions to be effective
February 4-14 as water deliveries in the 1
st
and 2
nd
aqueducts serving the District will be curtailed during this period for a tie-in at the Skinner Filtration Plant. In order that water in
the District’s storage facilities will be available for domestic in-home use and fire protection,
conservation provisions were implemented for the shutdown period which include a
prohibition of water use for agricultural purposes except livestock watering, outdoor
landscape irrigation and all unnecessary domestic use. Exceptions were granted to
mushroom farmers, nurseries with seedlings and construction grading projects so as to not
cause any undue economic hardships. If necessary, water needed for grading can be drawn
from the construction meters at Lake Turner. Updates on the shutdown period will be
maintained on the District’s web site as water deliveries in the aqueducts may be reinstated
earlier than originally estimated.
General Manager Arant reported that at present the District has 60% of its water storage
representing approximately 70 million gallons. Water flows were at maximum capacity during
the 4-day period prior to the shutdown as customers were deep watering in preparation of the
water use restrictions. Water usage has now leveled off, and with the cooperation of our
agricultural as well as domestic customers, the water levels are expected to be adequate to
meet all in-home and fire protection needs for the duration of the shutdown.
10. Evaluation of the SDCWA’s Rate Reform Process:
The proposed rate model, COSAM, being considered pursuant to the San Diego County
Water Authority’s rate reform process would access each member agency a fixed charge
based on a rolling 5-year average of water purchases. Under COSAM, if the City of San
Diego were to substantially reduce its water purchases from the SDCWA, the District’s water
costs could increase but the total cost would be less than its affect with the Authority’s
current rate structure.
Valley Center Municipal Water District
Board of Directors’ Meeting
7 2/4/02
GENERAL COUNSEL’S AGENDA
11. Analysis of the San Diego County Water Authority’s Supply Options:
Genera Counsel Cowett stated that during an Authority presentation on its supply options,
its analysis of costs of the desalination project was based on per acre foot costs while the
proposed Regional Colorado River Conveyance Facility, “Bi-national Pipeline”, used capital
costs. As such, the analysis would not support an objective or scientific comparison of the
two alternative supply options.
Continuing to pursue the bi-national pipeline with an estimated cost of $2.7 billion, which does
not represent any new water supply, was questioned. Local desalination projects that are
estimated to cost $1.65 billion will bring in a new water source to the region.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ AGENDA
12. Region 10 Meeting:
Director Aleshire reported that at a recent Association of California Water Agencies
Region 10 meeting, 5 recommendations were approved to be submitted to the ACWA Board.
They are:
1. Submit water related questions to the state’s candidates for governor with their responses
to be published in the ACWA News.
2. Develop and submit water related questions prior to the fall elections for all candidates
of state offices.
3. Propose that the money the state can divert from voter approved initiatives be limited.
4. ACWA oppose any water related bond issue that does not include development of both
surface and subsurface off stream storage.
5. Include desalination seminars at the ACWA Conferences.
13. Retirement Announcement:
Director of Finance Jarrell announced that, effective on August 12, 2002, he is planning on
retiring from the District. He noted that he has been an employee at the District since
February of 1977 and will be moving to Arizona where he will reside closer to his children.
He expressed his appreciation to the Board for their support. Mr. Jarrell was commended by
the Board for his many contributions to the District’s operations and ACWA programs.
Valley Center Municipal Water District
Board of Directors’ Meeting
8 2/4/02
CLOSED SESSION
14. A Closed Session was called by President Broomell at 3:42 p.m. pursuant to:
• Government Code §54956.9(a), Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation.
Name of Case: Sweetwater Authority, et al. v. Dynegy, Inc., et al.
Superior Court Case GIC 760743
• Government Code §54956.9(c), Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation.
Number of potential cases: 1
• Government Code §54957.6(a), Employee Performance Evaluation
Title of Position: General Manager
The Regular Board meeting was reconvened at 4:48 p.m. No action was reported.
ADJOURNMENT
15.
Upon motion by Aleshire, seconded by Stone and unanimously carried, the meeting was adjourned at 4:50 p.m.
ATTEST: ATTEST:
______________________________ _______________________________
Secretary President